MUHAMMAD ATIF NIZAMI versus STATE
The application name for the acquittal and dismissing of witnesses to section 265K and 561A Penal Code (XLV of 1860), section 324/34 FIR was not registered in the FIR, Yes, his presence at the scene of the incident was to be supported. The FIR was silent on the presence of any other person, except that the person named in the FIR did not give any identification of the accused, nor was the motorcycle number etc. The evidence that was brought to the record was so far away. That was difficult for the prosecution. The evidence of witness testimony to link the accused to the crime is hardly linked to the alleged crime and even they were not named in the FIR, in which case the possibility of linking the accused to the commission of the crime Was not present and the FIR operation was terminated and the accused acquitted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Hub Chowki lawyer