Find a Lawyer

MIR HASSAN versus MASTER HAMMAD

Section 1 Civil Procedure Code (Amendment) Ordinance (X of 1980), Section 15 Appeals for Fatal Accident Compensation Plaintiff, who was a minor and filed by her father / next friend for the recovery of her father / next friend He was permanently disabled due to traumatic injuries in the lawsuit. The plaintiffs have been charged Rs.5,500,000 alleging that the plaintiff driver was driving too fast and recklessly resulting in serious injury to the plaintiff. After the trial, a declaration was issued with 14 annual annual interest in the amount of Rs. 8,00,000. Until the defendant's disappointment, the decree stated that the trial court's decision preferred appeal, the evidence on the record has proved that the coach's plaintiff / driver very quickly mistook the minor plaintiff passerby. Drag the minor passer by about a dozen feet. The minor plaintiffs, along with the wheel of the coach, suffered serious injuries to the plaintiff to record any evidence that he had taken proper care of a heavy vehicle on the public road to prevent the accident, motor accident compensation The car should be responsible for the error and the quantum determination must be liberal, not precisely because the law values life and limbs in a freely independent country, which the court correctly ruled. , So the appeal against the decision and the appeal against the trial decision were dismissed under circumstances r \ n famous high court advocate from Tharparkar lawyer