Article 3 (3A), (3B) and (3C) [as substituted by section 3 of the High Courts (Establishment) Order (Punjab Amendment) Ordinance (I of 1981)] Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Applicant The counsel for the petitioner was of the view that because the order passed before the High Court was approved by the Provincial Board of Revenue (Lahore), under the territorial jurisdiction of the principal set of the Lahore High Court and under Article 199 (1). doing. (a) (ii) The High Court of the Principal Seat of the Constitution was entitled to defy the Constitution, which was permissible, the applicant was a resident of the area within the jurisdiction of the Circuit Bench. The land in the dispute was located in the same area. The original mutation name was adopted at the same place and the jurisdiction to appeal the appointment of the revenue was also within the scope of the Circuit Bench, in the circumstances, it was the relevant Circuit Bench and not the purpose of setting up a High Court Principal Seat Bench. If the lawyer's arguments were accepted by the Chief Justice with the above observations, be void High r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
