ADAMJEE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. KARACHI THROUGH SARFRAZ ALI versus STATE
Sections 516A and 517 of the Penal Code (XLV of 1860), section 381 of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), section 22; 32, 33 and 74, of a vehicle allegedly used in drug trafficking. Temporary custody of the car stolen by an unknown thief Before the theft car was insured before the insurance company / insurance company trial court dismissed the temporary custody request. By the insurance company on two grounds. First, the company may dispose of the car after it has been acquired by the supermarket, and second, that the company's application was barred under section 74 under the Control of Narcotic Substances Act 1997. Goods used in drug trafficking will not be delivered. (i) the accused. (ii) the partner of the accused. (iii) the relative of the accused. And (iv) any private person stated that the law did not stand for petition by the insurance company to keep him in custody because the company declared him as the accused, or the accused's partner, or a relative. Can't give A confession about a legal officer or even a private person's confession that the insurance company was a legal person was misconstrued because the legal person could not be equated with the private person. Paid the claim of his registered owner or the registered owner of the car or the insurance company had no recourse to the drug-related offense that was caught red-handed while carrying the marijuana in the stolen car. Was denied by the insurance company, the trial court forced the company to stand Seven
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
