Section 497 (2) Offense Hood (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Sections 10/11 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 471, 467 and 468 bail, no further inquiry into the accused's grant FIR Thayer with a special role, but the High Court had to temporarily test based on the available records, serious allegations were made against the accused, but minutes after the record it was revealed that the accused was suspected because of this. That the complainant / accused person had filed a constitutional petition before the High Court, according to which he denied all the charges against the accused. And before the court that she herself was going to trial, she had, in her free will and consent, entered into a marriage contract with the accused. But then she withdrew from her statement. And they filed an application for registration of a criminal case in the Justice Department. This would mean that he had changed his first position, that the complainant's statement could not be relied upon because his statement before the High Court was in direct conflict with his plea which he later found to be a criminal The case was registered before the Justice of Peace. The eight-month delay in filing an FIR against the accused, which could not be adequately explained if that actually happened, would not have led to the complainant's family filing a case against the accused or And there was no reason to file an abduction case. In the case of the complainant clearly falling under the scope of further inquiry, the accused was admitted to bail, under the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
