Section 7 (e) Contempt of Conduct (XLV of 1860), sentence of appreciation of section 365 evidence, reduction of mitigation conditions Complaint was made hostage using physical force and kept under threat and terror by the threat of firearms. Had been robbed and taken away. Her clothes and a promissory note were also signed to snap her nude photos. All this was done in the event of a terrorist taking the hostage hostage, and the fear was that the complainant at the time of the incident. Not only recovered Rs 15,000 from the kidnappers, but they demanded to receive Rs 5 lakh from the provisions of Section 7 (e) of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 and Section 365 AA, PPC. So, too, the complainant abductor was completely lured in this case. Confirming the natural witnesses of the incident, who had no enmity or intention to falsely implicate the accused in this case, the complainant was to receive a ransom of Rs 2 lakh from the accused by lso to impress the fact and trust. Wally Acular proved through testimony, which he had recovered from the threat of killing the complainant and his children, and by publishing nude photos of him in newspaper photos, the complainant had filed an FIR The delay in entering the AR was fully explained. Although it is understandable to threaten to blackmail a complainant in public or in the locality through his nude photographs, he being a sensible and educated individual did not realize that this application was a nasty publication. The charge has been increased. Image section in newspaper
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
