Sections 13, 15 and 17 were allowed by the Controller of Implementation of the eviction eviction order, which was confirmed by the Appellate Authority and proceedings for execution were held which stated that it was in the possession of the property with the partner. Bought a shop from And that it rejected the trial court's objection to the objection raised by the tenant, and also dismissed the first appeal filed by the tenant. There is no provision for a second appeal against the order passed and certified by the appellate court, the tenant cannot claim to be the co-owner of the property upon receipt of the executed sale in favor of his son. The tenant was declared a tenant and under it the rental controller, the appellate authority below, ordered him to be evicted. Even if it is deemed by the High Court that the contract of sale is in favor of the tenant, he will not be jointly co-owner in the Operation Questions where it was ordered to be removed at the request of the landlord. The second appeal was dismissed as civil suit
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
