MUHAMMAD AWAIS AKHTAR versus BAHA-UD-DIN ZAKARIA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN THROUGH VICE-CHANCELLOR
Regulation 11 (iv) (b), (v) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application was promoted in the 7th semester after qualifying for the sixth semester, but failed. Was detained in the 7th semester because of. 50 by the course that he had taken, the applicant believed that pursuant to Rule 11 (iv) (b) of the Equal Semester Rules, (2007), to obtain a CGPA of 2 00 after detention in the seventh semester. Will be a student. Progress was made the next semester, but the applicant, despite obtaining 2 3 KCGPAs, was declared unsuccessful The principles prevailing for conducting the examination provided that the student must Must have a minimum CGPA of 2 00 and pass 50% of the course offered. Passing 50% of the course in the semester, conditions were a prerequisite for progress in the next semester and obtaining CGPA2 promotion was not enough for just one promotion petitioner; GPA, but did not succeed. 50 The defamation proceedings against the applicant in passing 50 courses were done in accordance with the rules and regulations, cannot be placed in the Constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court, as it is strictly forbidden to exclude a student from the department's roll. Required. Applicant's failure to deal with discrimination or unequal treatment, as well as a ban on adherence to standards, his application was dismissed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
