Sections 2 (b), 201 364 and ??? ????? Definition of evidence did not prove recovery of the money from the accused's possession, stating that the recovery was clearly disclosed a month and a half after the alleged first departure of the deceased. It was unbelievable that anyone would maintain the money for so long that the alleged extra-judicial confession that was made before the police, was not reliable and credible and could not be said voluntarily. The body of the victim was found dead and buried in the courtyard of the house which the accused had taken to the defense along with the rent prosecution, both failed. Were somewhat credible in establishing their respective versions and both were not credible in the recovery of the dead body of the Rome House, the accused fully involved in the murder of the victim, especially in this case because of his false interference. No enmity between the witnesses and the accused was found in the record, the accused did not present any witness in support of his defense and the incident was an unexpected incident. The prosecution's case was based on circumstantial evidence and in the witness statements. The circumstances described by the contradictions and the prosecution created a severe mitigation situation in favor of the accused case, given the circumstances But there was no plea was filed by the accused, the death penalty was abolished under section 382 B under penalty of life imprisonment, Cr also been extended to accused
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
