Section 378 and 379 of the Punjab Tenancy Act (XVI of 1887), the proposed Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution, the offense of theft under section 378, PPC will be made if any immovable property is illegally If taken out of possession. Without the consent of this person, a tenant would occupy the land and take possession of the land born with the permission and permission of the landlord / owner of the property and if any of these Jointly occupies with consent. The transferred property was stripped of such land against the consent of its owner; under section 787878 the offense, PPC, will not be excluded. The registration of a case against the applicant / tenant was against the law and, on the advice of the banned lawyer (s) for the complainant (D) Section 787878, the PPC claimed that the tenant's status as a maid. In the light of this example, the dispute of correctness was terminated because the tenant's status as a private employee could not be construed as a private employee. Because the rights and liabilities of the tenant and the landlord were governed by the Tenancy Act, whatever land the tenant cultivated and She had claimed. Through the landlord, the tenant shared it and his proprietary rights would extend to the crop jointly grown with the owner and he is entitled to the physical possession of the applicant for the first time even though he is entitled to Section 249A. Can get your treatment by moving the application under The CCP, however, in the light of the circumstances of the case, the Article Article
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
