UNITED BANK LIMITED THROUGH ATTORNEYS versus UMEED ALI
Section 46 and (47 (ment) compulsory retirement appeal respondent / employee while serving as cashier in the bank, charge sheet was made against the employee and the inquiry committee stopped three increments). Recommended, but disagree with the recommendation of the bank management committee, retired employee must file a complaint for restoration of employment against mandatory retirement order and with the help of his previous benefits. - After the service and the sentence remains, the employee will be entitled to the previous benefits up to 50, both the employee and the bank will pay Filed in Appeals, Bank Appeals to Retain Employee's Mandatory Retirement Order in Appeal and Separates Affected Persons - Decision, while Employee Appeals F in his Appeal Or the restoration without a hike, with a penalty and a 100% return with the benefit of a charge sheet confirmation message conveyed a different message from the original incident, and this situation was rarely dealt with by the Labor Court. Gave. The Labor Court held that the employees did not commit any misappropriation / misuse of the money as the bank alleged the employee was negligent, however the Labor Court found it and when any employee was found to be negligent, then a larger punishment. Can't be imposed, but the minor penalty will be quite fine, which was imposed according to the recommendations of the inquiry committee and was validated when the restoration was also carried out in the form of a minor fine, it would not be appropriate. That burden on the employee to pay past benefits
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
