Find a Lawyer

MST. MUMTAZ BEGUM versus ADDITIONAL CUSTODIAN OF ENEMY PROPERTY FOR PAKISTAN

Section 12 (2) Section 12 (2), Request for CPC Scope, Section 12 (2), for a decision, order or order made by CPC, was to show that the same fraud, Misrepresentation or jurisdiction was the result of a desire. Where the material on record fails to indicate that there is any element of fraud or misrepresentation in this case or the court has a desire for jurisdiction, Section 11 (2), the provisions of the CPC Will not be done.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• EJAZ INAYAT v. Rt. Rev. Dr. A.J. MALIK 2009 PLD 57
• NAZIA JAVED v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary, Education Department, Lahore 2009 PLC(CS) 58
• SHAFQAT ALI v. State 2009 YLR 60
• Mst. KISHWAR SULTANA v. MUHAMMAD SADDIQUE 2009 CLC 61
• UNITED BANK LIMITED through Attorneys v. UMEED ALI 2009 PLC 64
• NIGAR BIBI v. SALAH-UD-DIN KHAN ALIZAI 2009 PLD 67
• MUHAMMAD SALEHON v. MEHDI KHAN 2009 YLR 67
• HABIB-UR-REHMAN v. D.P.O. 2009 PLD 69

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

ask a advocate free from Padidan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes