MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus CHIEF ENGINEER (IRRIGATION), SARGODHA ZONE SARGODHA
Sections 46 and 48 of the Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Section O15 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition dismissed, enforcement of restoration order by the High Court in the appeal filed Was dismissed from the job, filed a complaint before the Labor Court against the dismissal order, which was rejected by the Labor Court, the applicant filed a Labor Appeal in front of the High Court, which In the appeal, the order passed by the High Court was ordered to be restored from submission to the petitioner's rehabilitation. After the failure, it filed a constitutional petition against its non-implementation. The counsel's counsel's suggestion was that the decision of the High Court approved in the appeal was challenged before the Supreme Court and the matter was pending. The final decision, the High Court should have a hand in this matter. If the High Court hands over the matter after appealing for appeal before the Supreme Court, it will not only infringe the rights of the aggrieved party but willfully invalidate it. The way of use will also open up. Decree of the High Court If the High Court shall have a hand in the matter after the petition for leave of appeal (unless there has been no restraint), it will literally mean that the parties are now in the process of executing the High Court order. The court is free to do so on their own behalf, which will not only cause injustice to the party to whom the High Court has ruled, but it will also completely and practically disqualify the High Court from its powers. So that its order will be executed and any rule
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
