Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), the decision was made in favor of the plaintiff for specific performance on the basis of the section 100 suit agreement The second appeal was raised by the Scope Plaintiff that the plaintiff's evidence contained material contradictions and both The lower courts did not apply their judicial mind. There was evidence on the record to prove that the agreement was executed, Notary Public's sole statement confirmed that the transaction was sufficient to prove it, because the witness was independent, though the same was proved by other witnesses. According to the legal requirements of the law, nothing can be recovered from the witnesses in any interim examination, therefore, the agreement proved that the parameters of the second appeal were limited and limited only to procedural deviations. Do not respond to a material issue or decision. Appeal against the law and its touch tone was not maintainable appeal was dismissed under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
