FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY M/O PETROLEUM AND NATURAL RESOURCES versus DURRANI CERAMICS
The Second, Second and Second Schedule Gas Infrastructure Development Cess (C cess), whether the cess imposed on the issue was intended to be used for specific purposes, viz. (Gas) pipeline projects, liquid natural gas (LNG) infrastructure or other imported alternative fuel prices, which include liquid petroleum gas (LPG) cesses, usually increase revenue Was not a common burden for the CIS to be used for a specific purpose for the benefit and benefit of the gas users The SIS was to be mainly blamed on mainly domestic consumers with a rebate on all gas consumers, who used only 20% of the total gas. However, 76% of the total gas used by the people from whom the cess was collected would benefit mainly from the above cess, as this would ensure continuous supply of gas and increased supply to such sector. Other consumers or the country as a whole will also benefit from the (gas pipeline) plans, but it is inevitable that the gains payers receive are exempt from the annual budget statement (Federal Budget 2013). , Gas Infrastructure Development Cess was listed as non-taxable, so on appeal of the Government itself, there was no cess tax in question, according to which the appeal was dismissed.
