PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE versus DISTRICT BAR ASSOCIATION, KHANEWAL
Section 10 Punjab Privatization Board Act (IV of 2010), Articles 6 (h), (i), 27 and 28 (a) State Land Allotment Regulations Allotment of Land to Public Auction State Individual or private by private agreement. Legal Housing Scheme For Lawyers For Sale For Sale The Chief Minister announced the establishment of lawyers colonies in the respective districts and directed the Revenue Organization officers to allot land for residential schemes and assess the value of the case on a pretext. Pending. Or other relevant bar associations filed constitutional petitions before the High Court, which were allowed, and the bar associations were declared absolute owners of the state subject to the payment of land value. The allotment of state land was not an individual's right but, in fact, it was a bounty that no person had any right or title in the public land until the approval of a written order and brought to the allotment / grant. ? In the present case, the bar association was neither allotted the land nor legally occupied it, this record shows that the bar association has been summarized three times in relation to the allotment of land. Higher allotments cannot be ruled out. The provincial government did not formulate a policy for the sale / allotment of state land through public auction till the allotment was approved till such time as there was no special arrangement for the allotment of land for the residential scheme. was not. The High Court did not consider the fact that the provincial government had no promotion of state land without observing the implementation of the relevant policy.
