Find a Lawyer

KAMRAN MURTAZA versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Arts 2A, 17 and 184 (3) under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution, all the areas of national life marched by political parties under the constitutional petition and such situation have some officials or workers illegally benefiting from the situation. And encourage them to resort to some unconstitutional measures. That the Supreme Court should intervene in this matter so that the relevant issues can be resolved within the purview of the Constitution and the law and the democratic dignity and republic of the republic is not insulted or harmed. The Supreme Court directed that all state authorities and officials should act in accordance with the constitution and the law only in the case of Sindh High Court Bar Association v. Federation of Pakistan (PLD 2009 SC 897). The Constitution should refrain from acting unnecessarily. Law

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2014

• FAYYAZ AHMED v. State 2014 SCMR 1628
• FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary M/o Petroleum and Natural Resources v. DURRANI CERAMICS 2014 SCMR 1630
• MUHAMMAD NADEEM WAQAS v. State 2014 SCMR 1658
• NICE 'N' EASY FASHION (PVT.) LTD. v. ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN 2014 SCMR 1662
• MUNIR AHMAD v. State 2014 SCMR 1669
• PAKISTAN WAPDA EMPLOYEES PEGHAM UNION v. MEMBER, NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION, ISLAMABAD 2014 SCMR 1676
• MUHAMMAD AZAM v. State 2014 SCMR 1683
• CHIEF COMMISSIONER, INLAND REVENUE v. MUHAMMAD AFZAL KHAN 2014 SCMR 1687

All Supreme Court judgments of 2014 →

criminal advocate from Sialkot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes