MUMTAZ RANI versus BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYAUNIVERSITY, MULTAN THROUGH VICE-CHANCELLOR
Article 199 Constitution Petitions Education authorities advised the lawyers for admission to the college, stating that on the last date of admission to the application, the applicants were pressed for five months and four days and they deliberately The fact was hidden in the admission form for the authorities, the council further requested that the applicant's treatment was available to the applicant under the admission rules related to the relevant year's rule, but he benefited from the move. No, the constitutional petition was not even a competent lawyer. The petitioner submitted a photocopy of the appeal to the Vice-Chancellor of the University in response to the objection, which is still awaiting an unconstitutional petition which the High Court directed the Vice-Chancellor of the University to constitute. Was dealt with. Appellant's Admission Committee to Settle Pet Offers Ioner's appeal is positive within a positive date If the applicant does not succeed before the Appellate Admissions Committee, he / she will be entitled to a refund of the admission fee from the University as the applicant applied at the time of admission. He was negligent in not calculating his age. General Chat Chat Lounge r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
