The 13-hour delay in filing an FIR was not natural and the explanation of such delay was invalidated by the statements of the investigating officer, in which the complaint on the prosecution's story was defective in section 302 (b). The victim was the victim's son while the other prosecutor's witness was the victim's real brother. Both said that the witnesses were not only closely related to each other and to the deceased, but they were not even close to the location of the incident and their presence on the spot was incidental, even to the state. The lawyer also admitted. Given that witnesses could not make their presence on the spot, the possibility cannot be ruled out that this is an irrational incident and the prosecution's story was summoned after the body was found, otherwise there was no reason to stop. According to the doctor's opinion for at least two hours, at least in the case of the survivor's aid, the affairs of the president had denied his presence. Eyewitnesses at the scene were not impressed by witnesses' statements and were unable to make false statements because according to the prosecution, the suspects were armed with guns and were present on the spot, but they allegedly had only one Lakara. Do not pick up and use their weapons during the incident, when it was said that the perpetrators of the evacuation were merely intended to use the location of the incident, but the location other than the deceased's close relatives. No evidence from was presented by the prosecution. Relying on the relatives of the deceased's close relatives to prosecute in a murder case, the prosecutor
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
