GHULAM ABBAS versus MUNIR HUSSAIN ALIAS MUHAMMAD MUNIR
Section 12 law fails to present specific evidence, minor testimony of the contract to sell the evidence (Arts 10 (1984), Arts 17 (2) and 79 Civil Procedure Code (V 1908), O. XVII, R 13) on two occasions. Despite numerous occasions, the plaintiff failed to produce evidence, therefore, the trial court under AXVII, R13CPC, closed their evidence and the case was dismissed, despite the plaintiff taking considerable advantage in their favor. The alleged sale to the claimant failed to prove. Opportunities to present evidence could not present a single trivial witness to the contract of sale, although the law required at least two minor witnesses to prove the document when a defendant himself appeared in the witness box, but then he Ran away and didn't even come here. Back for cross-examination, therefore, the trial court closed down the plaintiffs' favor with plaintiff's failure to identify any jurisdiction, failure to identify legal weakness, material irregularity, misreading and non-reading of evidence. The conclusions drawn by the previous courts were not liable to interfere with the jurisdictional proceedings under Section 115 CPC and the final conclusions of the facts on the basis of the claims were maintained and maintained by the High Court Amendment. Dismissed in circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
