Section 4 bail bond Forfeiture Guarantee The defendant for whom the applicant remained on bail appearing in the court on his own bail, the accused's request for bail was already dismissed and the notice to the applicant / bail under section 1414 The CRP was also failed to bail, the trial court upheld the bail bond in favor of the state and imposed a fine of Rs 25,000. The trial court also directed the concerned tehsildar to attach and sell the aforesaid stacked crops so that the court could hear a legal case to determine the amount confiscated. Under Section 14514, CRPC, the law imposes an illegal self-made procedure, based on evidence and evidence, on the basis of the bail in the state's favor that the guarantor of payment of fines be terminated. Or the reason why it should be shown why not pay compensation is that the trial court demanded bail to show cause without having to bail out the bail bond, a trial court order violating the mandatory provisions of Secto. N514, CR PC, was not sustainable Trial court seized bail bonds in favor of the state, which had to be seized before issuing show cause notices and orders for collection and sale of standing crops under the applicant / guarantor guarantee. Should. ) According to section 514, the CCP had clearly stated that the court could proceed to recover the confiscated amount by issuing warrants for the issuance of guarantees related to collateral guarantees, a trial trial. The Court cannot direct the attachment of the subordinate and the provisions of section 141414 (1)
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
