WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER versus ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, MINES AND MINERAL, ATTOCK
A. VII, RR 2 and 10 Punjab Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1990, R48 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Request Defendant's return in his suit for payment of unauthorized excavation of slate defendant. Ali's claim challenged. The trial court dismissed the case, while the appellate court accepted the defendants' appeal and returned the case to the plaintiffs for the former party to appear before the forum, with the trial court having jurisdiction over the civil court. The question was ascertained and it was found that the question raised by the defendants through the claim of the Court of Appeal for unauthorized excavation during the return of the plaintiff to the plaintiffs under O VII, R 10, CPC. No jurisdiction to lift, CPC observed that trial court's decision and order jurisdiction The decision on the related question was not open to immunity when both the courts came to the conclusion that the civil court has no jurisdiction, requesting review by the plaintiffs under R48 of the Punjab Minor Minerals Concession Rules 1990. , The Secretary of State was not able to refuse, in the case of Punjab, to file a case or request a decision. In the trial court's appeal, the illegal order was wrongly approved by the provincial secretary, without any legal authority, the review petition filed by the defendants will be considered pending before the director's licensing, Will decide within the parameters of On your own merits
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
