CHIEF COMMISSIONER, INLAND REVENUE versus MUHAMMAD AFZAL KHAN
Equal discrimination respondents were appointed as senior auditors (BPS 16) in the Sales Tax Department, performing similar tasks in different departments of Arts 25, 185 (3) and 199 Civil Service. Was when respondents were re-nominated after the restructuring of the tax department. Respondents of Inland Revenue Audit Officers filed a constitutional request before the High Court to rank their positions on the requirement of graduating the positions of BSP18 in other departments such as Auditor General of Pakistan, Accountant General Punjab and Controller General Accounts. Filed The Constitution was allowed by the High Court on the basis that the respondents of the Audit Officers in other departments performed similar actions; thus, they would be discriminated against for refusing to give BPS 18, and in Article 2 of the Office ( A) Whether the Supreme Court of the United States has granted leave of appeal on the December 20, 2001 Memorandum of Appeal for the similarity of the same nature provided for the uniformity of upgrading of similar posts in different departments. The constitutional petition filed by the respondents before the High Court is permissible, as the subject matter is the defendant's terms of service and conditions. And thus the jurisdiction of the Special Services Tribunal; whether paragraph No. 2 (a) of the Office Memorandum 20 of 2001 may be raised in such a way that the upgrading of a post in one department of the Government to other departments I will provide a scope to officers who perform similar jobs. The rank of the rank, as provided above, provides that if necessary to bring rationality to the administrative structure.
