Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN WAPDA EMPLOYEES PEGHAM UNION versus MEMBER, NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION, ISLAMABAD

Article 8, Pakistan and the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 1 (185 ()) of the Registrar of Trade Unions, allegations of corruption and corruption against trade unions do not support documentary evidence. The petitioners' union has been bribed by the registrar and has been corrupted, so the application for registration of the claimant's union has been challenged. A collective bargaining agent was held for selection, and the respondent union defeated the applicant union by a large majority.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2014

• MUHAMMAD NADEEM WAQAS v. State 2014 SCMR 1658
• NICE 'N' EASY FASHION (PVT.) LTD. v. ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN 2014 SCMR 1662
• KAMRAN MURTAZA v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2014 SCMR 1667
• MUNIR AHMAD v. State 2014 SCMR 1669
• MUHAMMAD AZAM v. State 2014 SCMR 1683
• CHIEF COMMISSIONER, INLAND REVENUE v. MUHAMMAD AFZAL KHAN 2014 SCMR 1687
• MUREED HUSSAIN v. State 2014 SCMR 1689
• Sheikh SALEEM v. Mrs. SHAMIM ATTAULLAH KHAN 2014 SCMR 1694

All Supreme Court judgments of 2014 →

advocate from Hub Chowki lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes