Section 337N (2) Criminal Code of Conduct (V1898), Section 498 Heritage Plaintiffs and Nolo's Claim Applicable Applicable High Court directed that at the time of hearing of the application for post-arrest bail in case of injury, the accused The person is not a former criminal, habitual or harsh, frustrated or dangerous criminal, or where the crime has not taken place in his name or honor, if the accused person offers to collect the required amount of money or damages in the case. In case of his final conviction, the court, if any, to preserve the relevant money as punishment, and if his physical remand has expired and the legal investigation period has expired, he will usually be guaranteed. Should be entered in the related article. Such a deal will not be available to any accused to warrant arrest if he or she is a former offender or temporarily confronted by a court or mentor. Severe, frustrated or dangerous offender or where the crime was committed in his hand or in honor, at the time of accusation in all injury cases where the accused person is no ex-offender, habitual or harsh, frustrated or dangerous offender. Or where the offense has not been done in his name or in the name of honor, the trial court should ask the accused if he / she is ready to apply. Whether or not NOLO is a claimant (no contest) if the only punishment awarded to him is to pay the victim the required amount of money or damages. If the accused agrees to demand the plea on this basis then he or she will usually Should be punished and punished accordingly. Without trial
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
