Articles 8, 42 and 39 of the Transfer Property Act (IV 1882), declaration of section 52 suit, trial for trial and cancellation of sale proceedings by the trial court and the appellate court for the alleged sale rights. I was accused of selling suit properties. In the process, the defendant did not prove the slightest evidence of the alleged sale, he did not appear in court to prove that the defendant was the beneficiary of the sale, the burden of proof on which he was charged Failure to exclude the imposed sale was made in favor of the defendant during the approval of the case and the spread of a temporary injunction which is in violation of Section 52 of the Transferred Property Act, 1882, Affected, the two courts together ruled against the defendant and did not find the same amendment to be found in error. Ridge was
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
