The testimony of Section 2 302 (b) was denied by the trial court for the presence of witnesses and finally the conviction and conviction of the accused was recorded as per the report under section 737373, when the PC's affidavit denied the evidence of the prosecution. The matter was considered and the accused's statement was recorded to record his conviction and conviction, which was to be fully considered, under the excuse section of the statement of the accused report under section 173, the CCP never Evidence was not provided by the prosecution, nor did its contents prove in accordance with the provisions of Article 74 of the Shaha testimony 1984. For this reason, the trial court could not rely on the motive for the prosecution and sentencing, the presence of two witnesses of the prosecution, who were the victim's son and nephew, were denied by the trial court if they were all three witnesses. He was present on the occasion to defend his father, who was armed with theft and was 55 years old, while all four witnesses were young and capable, before the trial court. According to the observation. Further, when the defense plea is proved, the prosecution's case will be scattered and discredited. And if the defense counsel were to prove the credibility of the prosecution to the extent of doubt, it would be sufficient and if it was not established there would be no benefit to the prosecution on this account, the prosecutor is bound to prove the matter beyond doubt. Was. The burden of prosecution will not be less, if the defense plea is not proved or false then in the present case the accused has retired from his position by proving the defendant, the accused is within his rights to protect himself from the close.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
