Find a Lawyer

AAMAR ALI versus STATE

Although the section 497 Preamble Code (XLV of 1860), Section 6565B bail, the defendant's grant was not declared innocent, but sufficient material was collected in support of the request made by the investigating officer. In fact legal action is being taken against the complainant with his free will and consent which was contracted with the marriage contract. Zina was not charged in the case, under the circumstances

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• FOZIA BIBI v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER 2009 PCrLJ 588
• UMAR HASSAN v. State 2009 YLR 588
• SHAUKAT RASOOL v. State 2009 PLD 590
• FESCO LTD. v. ZAHID HAMEED 2009 YLR 592
• ALLAH JAWAYA v. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, POLICE STATION ISLAMPURA, LAHORE 2009 PLD 595
• GHAFOOR AHMED alias FLATOO v. State 2009 MLD 596
• IFTIKHAR AHMAD v. E.D.O. (HEALTH) 2009 PLC(CS) 600
• RUKSHANA MANZOOR v. EXCISE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT 2009 PLD 601

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

jobs for advocates from Narowal lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes