Find a Lawyer

SAFDAR ALIAS JAVED ALIAS JAJI versus STATE

Section 497 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324 and 109/34 guarantees, the defendant's grant was presented as the accused in this case even by a supplementary statement recorded nine and a half months after the incident. According to the FIR, the accused was not shown to be armed. As with any weapon, although the recovery of the pistol was carried out at his request, no indirect action was made to hurt the deceased or, on the testimony of one of the prosecution, Boyle was not allowed to be the accused under the circumstances. was given.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• MUHAMMAD AFZAL v. DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, LAHORE 2009 PLC(CS) 648
• AKHTER ALI v. ANJUMAN-E-ANSAR AHLE BAIT (Regd.) through President 2009 MLD 653
• MUHAMMAD ZAFAR v. State 2009 PCrLJ 656
• AHMAD KHAN NIAZI v. TOWN MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, LAHORE through Town Municipal Officer 2009 PLD 657
• GHULAM YASEEN v. State 2009 YLR 661
• MUHAMMAD ARSHAD IQBAL BUTT v. State 2009 MLD 665
• MUHAMMAD NAWAZ SIDDIQUI v. TAHIR AHMED 2009 YLR 667
• FAIZA ANSARI v. VICE-CHANCELLOR .BAHAU-UD-DIN ZAKRIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN 2009 MLD 670

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

immigration advocates from Sanghi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes