Article 5, Schedule and 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), the constitutional petition for the recovery of articles of Article 199 dowry was simultaneously rejected by the Family Court and the Appellate Court, thereby adding a single witness in support of his argument. Can not And under these circumstances Daisy's articles were not entitled to a claim. The Waldetti plaintiff also specifically mentioned the names and gold jewelry of these articles by her parents at the wedding. They also paid the price for the articles mentioned, the respondent was not exclusively Cross reviewed this part of the statement made by the plaintiff that there was every cause in the circumstances, to believe that the defendant had claimed the defendant's claim. Can not prove that the articles of dowry given to the plaintiff by his parents were sufficiently carried by him. There was evidence on file to prove that the dowry articles given to the plaintiff by his parents were still pending. No other witness can testify in support The courts below ignored the fact that the defendant had failed to produce any other evidence for the rebellion. The plaintiff's conclusions disposed of by the courts below were concurrently unfair, unlawful, void, and set aside the judgment and injunction issued by the following courts against the prescribed rules of law. And the plaintiff was entitled to recover the dowry articles.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
