Section 2 302 // 34 Definition of Evidence Son Late, who was involved in the incident, which became the bone of contention between the parties, was not produced by the prosecution who allegedly complained about her husband's departure. It was reported to (the accused) along with the suspect and his accomplice, who had previously taken the deceased to the police station to settle the dispute, that the prosecution had stopped the gunman's absence from the crime. Presence of forensic science laboratory in presence and positive report, recovery of licensed pistol from accused's possession, prosecution case not proceeding Otherwise, the recovery of the pistol from the accused could not have been proved by prosecution beyond doubt. The investigating officer allegedly recovered the pistol from a square in the possession of the accused, which was in a public place, but not the public's dependent witness demanded that they witness the recovery, justified the trial. Gone, in not relying on the retrieval of the weapons of the crime, no clear reliance can be placed on the evidence of both witnesses as both were witnesses; they failed to prove that they were actually present at the time of the incident. The incident was located near a shrine and it happened at dawn, but no one came from that area. Material contradictions and contradictions were found in the evidence of both witnesses to support the contamination version. There was no enmity with falsely involved eye witnesses, but the accused could not be sent for execution on the basis of the above. Disappointment of the witness was not the only standard, but the court did
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
