BAYER CHEMICALS THROUGH PARTNER versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH LAW, JUSTICE AND HUMAN RIGHTS DIVISION, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
Sections 38 and 40 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The reason for the recovery of the tax evasion Notice of tax evasion by the authorities, without notice or information, entered the premises of the premises and audited it on the basis of the records of the premises. ? Re-audit allowed by independent team, filed by Appellate Authority. The validity audit team issued notices for re-auditing and after that such action was dropped and the authorities issued showcase notices on the basis of the first audit, once again the audit process needed to be completed. Started. Prior action may be taken against such party with non-cooperation or non-cooperation of the party but it was not permissible to resume the proceedings for re-audit, as the authorities neglected this aspect of the dispute and decided to represent the review without a valid reason. The raid was disputed for reasons and the decision of the SC to represent the SC in various matters related to the principles was decided by the Supreme Court and it was decided to disregard the prescribed law. There was no element of rational reasoning, such an order could not be obtained without legal authority Appeared, and with no legal effect, the High Court, with constitutional jurisdiction, instructed the authorities to proceed with a fresh audit by an independent team of auditors, as permitted by the Collector's Petition. Was gone
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
