Defining section 2 (2 (b)) of the evidence was an immediate FIR filed in the case to reduce the sentence, in which the accused was appropriately named and he was beaten to death on his head and The complainant on his left cheek was acquitted of responsibility, while the injuries to the victim and the complainant's body were due to twin arms because the lawyer's claim was of no avail. Medical evidence was contrary to the fact that the complainant did not say in the FIR that the accused had been hurt in the right way, neither the Baghdad nor he had appeared before the trial court. He did and he only stated that the accused was presented by eye witnesses due to injuries on the victim's head and left cheek of the injured prosecutor's witness. The presence of both witnesses was consistent with the medical evidence. It was natural because the location of the incident was severe on the complainant as well as the accused's encampment; and even the presence of both injured witnesses did not deny the prosecutor even otherwise it was a widespread incident and the neighbors' neighbors. There was no question of error detection. Other witnesses revealed the prosecution's testimony to be affected, according to the Chemical Examiner's report that Syed Bugda was found guilty of human blood and was able to prove that he had injured the suspect, according to the circumstances of the Cold Logic Prosecution. Had done. And the injured prosecutor's witness was sentenced to death 8 days later for his suffering; the suspect was properly sentenced by the trial court for his injury at the hands of the accused.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
