LT.-COL. GHULAM IDREES versus JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE 1ST CLASS, POLICE STATION RAWAT, DISTRICT RAWALPINDI
Article 420/468/471 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition The accused accused of selling his agricultural land in favor of the complainant on behalf of his mother-in-law and receiving it What was the amount of Rs 40,00,000 as money and also in the name of the latter who was not found to be the owner of the said land and that the accused lost the complainant by the fraud and misrepresentation. The investigating officer joined the inquiry before the seller made photocopies of the contract and the changes in question regarding the inquiry. Zam rejected the plea that the so-called shopkeepers and complainants had forged their signatures on the aforesaid agreement and declared it fraudulent. Complaint of Military Officer, Military Intelligence on Complainant's Report Dealing with Controversial Signatures Compared with Deed Documents, which were found to be different from each other, at the end of the investigation, the Investigating Officer submitted a negative final report to the Magistrate. The caller recommended the cancellation of the case, which did not agree with the police investigation, the crime against the accused was admitted. The sale agreement and the change before the investigating agency or the court were not enough to form part of the record, as it would require proof of executive signatures or proof of their authenticity until the contract contained in the contract proved Don't be. According to Article of78 of the 1984 law 1984 1984 1984 1984, it could not be read with evidence and the magistrate should have been excluded from consideration by the magistrate as well, but a negative report by the handwriting expert.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
