The testimony of section (c) was credible testimony in police narcotics cases, the absence of independent witnesses with the recovery process, therefore, will not impede the prosecution's case even otherwise, the eligible area always Refusing to come forward to give such evidence, the case was not fatal for the police officer, not to cite cases and public witnesses, even though the CI wanted to avenge his wrath despite the accusation against the accused. A huge 90kg of cannabis could not be arranged on the accused to fully empower the O staff. The procedure adopted by the police officers regarding the recovery of the monkeys was legal and the accused seized large quantities of raids by the raiding party, after receiving a report of irregularities by a chemical inspector. Recovery witnesses fully confirmed version of FIR crime and indictment conditions were maintained
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009