Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD NADIM versus STATE


The testimony of section (c) was credible testimony in police narcotics cases, the absence of independent witnesses with the recovery process, therefore, will not impede the prosecution's case even otherwise, the eligible area always Refusing to come forward to give such evidence, the case was not fatal for the police officer, not to cite cases and public witnesses, even though the CI wanted to avenge his wrath despite the accusation against the accused. A huge 90kg of cannabis could not be arranged on the accused to fully empower the O staff. The procedure adopted by the police officers regarding the recovery of the monkeys was legal and the accused seized large quantities of raids by the raiding party, after receiving a report of irregularities by a chemical inspector. Recovery witnesses fully confirmed version of FIR crime and indictment conditions were maintained

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
ask a advocate free from Samma Satta lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.