Section 2?2 (b) / evidence 34 Appreciating the evidence No accused was either nominated in the FIR or before the complainant and other witnesses of the prosecutor did not know any parade to identify the accused. Was not held. He was unable to say how he came to know about the names of the accused. In fact, another person also joined the investigation, no one on record in the evidence in the case. No disclosure was made in which a complaint was made to one of the accused and he voluntarily said that other persons were also meeting the police. The station, but he never suspected them because the suspects and the accused were not hostile to each other in this case, according to the FIR, at the moment when the prosecution witnesses were shown. ? His statement to the court, which made the whole story of the prosecution suspicious, no report from the forensic science laboratory that empty pistols were recovered from the recovered pistols. The suspects were acquitted.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
