Sections 42 and 54 of the Contract Act (IX of 1872), Sections 188, 214 and 215 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 115 Gift Def Proof Principal and Attorney, Relationships Misreading and Non-Reading Relationships Through a property transfer lawyer, the plaintiff appointed a general attorney who transferred the property in the name of his close relative; the trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, but the lower appellate court allowed the appeal. Granted and justified the trial while the trial accurately observed that the defendants included any oral or documentary evidence Do not strengthen their position, but the lower appellate court traveled beyond its jurisdiction under the law and concluded that it was not only contrary to the facts of this case, but also to the permanent view of the superior courts. Against the plaintiff, the plaintiff was able to prove that before giving a gift through the lawyer in favor of his relative, there was no consultation or pre-admission obta, the plaintiff did not give the lawyer any authority through him while the lower appellate court The decision of the Attorney General to separate the suit property in any way for the facts and the law violations. The principles were not implemented and therefore were not retained.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
