Find a Lawyer

FARZANA ANWAR versus S.H.O.

Article 199 In its statement filed by the officer investigating the constitutional application, the FIR applicant was refused to be rejected in which the FIR applicant stated that he himself was an independent court and with the consent of the co-accused Had entered the marriage, though she was performing the duties. Despite repeated calls, it did not appear that the FIR filed by the complainant was terminated because further proceedings on the basis of an FIR would be clearly misused by the court and the law.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• CITIZENS INVESTMENT CO. v. ASKARI LEASING LTD. 2009 CLD 1392
• AVARI HOTELS LIMITED through Controller v. DEPARTMENT OF EXCISE AND TAXATION GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, through Secretary 2009 CLC 1399
• SHAFQAT ALI v. Mst. RIFFAT NAZIR 2009 MLD 1403
• MUHAMMAD NAWAZ v. State 2009 PCrLJ 1403
• Syeda SABA BATOOL v. BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIA UNIVERSITY through Vice-Chairman 2009 YLR 1406
• ARSHAD ALI v. Rana MUHAMMAD ANWAR 2009 MLD 1410
• NAZAR ABBAS v. State 2009 YLR 1412
• STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman v. Mst. NASEEM BEGUM 2009 CLD 1413

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

best advocate from Astore lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes