A. XXXVII, Rr 2 and 3 (2) to replace the bank guarantee through the original title document of the holiday, par value, to defend the condition given on the bank guarantee equal to the amount of the claim for the sum of the claim. Permission granted by the trial court to the defendant for leave for defense but subject to it, after the submission of the bank guarantee, the defendant paid the bank guarantee equal to the amount claimed in the title property documents. Petitioned by the trial court and said that the application was rejected by the trial court and the validity of the High Court B. Nick Guaranty should have been allowed as security with the original title document of the replacement property, in the event that the case was originally decided by the Supreme Court when filing the original trial documents. With the instruction to accept the original title, the High Court was remanded as the High Court and the Trial Court order remanded the property and the matter was remanded to the trial court. That the original documents of the property submitted to the defendant shall be treated as security for grant purposes. Accordingly, the defense of the appeal was allowed
