Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASIF KHAN versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

R29 (1) (2) (3) (4) and (5) Police Rules Authorized Additional Additional Police Force for Permanent Absorption in Regular Force Scope Sub Rules (1) to (3) of R29 of 1934 Additional persons, who are in the Additional Police Force, will be part of the District Police and will be eligible for permanent absorption in the regular force whenever vacant vacancies occur, (sub) & ()) of the Rules of Police Rules. In 1934, additional personnel enlisted in the Additional Police Force will be contract employees. And such an agreement would have no right to permanent participation in the police force

Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2014

• MUHAMMAD KARIM v. KALA 2014 YLR 353
• IMRAN ALI v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2014 PLC(CS) 442
• ABDUL HAMEED v. NISAWAR HAYAT 2014 MLD 484
• Ch. MUHAMMAD SULEMAN v. DISTRICT ACCOUNTS OFFICER, MIRPUR, AK 2014 PLC(CS) 520
• ASHFAQ AHMED v. Ch. MAQBOOL RAZA 2014 CLC 554
• MUHAMMAD ASGHAR KHAN v. IRFAN SHARIF 2014 YLR 623
• AZAD KASHMIR GOVERNMENT COOPERATIVE BANK LTD., MUZAFFARABAD v. Ch. MUHAMMAD AKRAM 2014 PLC(CS) 639
• Raja MUZAFFAR HUSSAIN KHAN v. BOARD OF REVENUE through Member Muzaffarabad 2014 CLC 758

All Supreme Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2014 →

law websites from Kharian lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes