Articles 8, 31, 42 and 54 suit for the trial, claim, record accuracy and plaintiff's permanent injunction were a survey in which a canal measure was owned and occupied. And that the defendants, who entered the name of Gheramaru, had snatched the country from him in the guise of entering into some of the measles gurus, on the basis of the custody which the land occupied in their favor. Was hanged by a donor in 1989. The owner was exclusively occupied with no survey number and no land was dropped in the questions, but in no other case was a gift made with regard to the land being acquired, and neither. It was mentioned in the Gift Process that the above mentioned survey number was handed over to the claimant in respect of the gift of the claimant, it was not of a specific survey number but in connection with the entire section of the owner / donors. Was. The plaintiff had failed to prove his case that he had ever occupied a specific survey number and had been taken away by the defendants, the suit was dismissed,
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2014
