O XLVI Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), O XLVII, R 1 The review of the Supreme Court's decision in civil and criminal matters was very limited in scope, and on this basis it did not reopen the whole matter. Jaska. Examining one party was possible by another interpretation of the law, or a party dissatisfied with the court's conclusions and wanted a different outcome for the party seeking review, as long as the court upheld the extremity of justice. Has to be fulfilled and has to be followed. The purpose of the relevant law and facts of the case was to consider the law, the facts of the case, the disputes and opinions of the parties, but the decision had to be made in the light of the law which the court considered as supreme. The decision in civil cases under OXLVI of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Supreme Court Rules 1978 can be allowed on a similar basis as given in O XLVII, R1. The treatment of the CPC through review petition was different from the appeal rev. The WJ could not be given the opportunity on the basis that the party was not satisfied with the decision, or a different view of the matter was possible or a separate interpretation of the law under OXLVI of the AJK Supreme Court rules. However, in 1978, the Supreme Court, during criminal proceedings, may review its verdict or order, if an error appears on the face of the record.
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2014
