ALL PAKISTAN TEXTILE MILLS ASSOCIATION THROUGH SECRETARY versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY COMMERCE, MINISTRY OF COMMERCE, ISLAMABAD
Article 199 Anti-Dumping Duty Ordinance (LXV of 2000), Section 64 (5) Abolition of Appellate Tribunal by the Federal Government under Section 64 of the Anti-Dumping Duty Ordinance, 2000 Treatment Maxims UB Just IB Repeam and Lex Semper Debate Repeam Applicable to the present case, the Association of Textile Manufacturers, of course, has the right to appeal under this law, which is a very sacred right, however, if for any reason the form of appeal is not exercised, then this valuable right is exercised. Well, the federal government can't allow frustration or violence because of the error because this law The basic principle is that the rights and remedies of the parties cannot be left vacant, thus, in the situation the Association (subject to its Luxury Standing) has the independent right to challenge any such order under Article 199 of the Constitution. If it was approved by a forum that could. It should be set up in a forum against which the certificate should be written, otherwise before the courts of the full civil jurisdiction under Section 9, CPC
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
