WAPDA THROUGH CHIEF ENGINEER/PROJECT DIRECTOR, MANGLA RAISING PROJECT, MANGLA versus RAJA MAROOF
Section 3 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O III, R2 and Section 115 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), Section 8 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Section 42 (12). The suit property for may require that the party's eligibility for appeal be filed by the authority or the person may be sued by the authority. The current WAPDA was filed by the Chief Engineer and the Project Director, only the authority had the power to file, request for review and appeal. In addition to the Chairman, Chief Engineer, Superintendent Engineer, Project Director and Circle Directors, etc. who were able to consult a lawyer for their WAPDA lawsuit, defense suit, other actions, signing, certification. The consultation options have been assigned by you. Plates, written statements, other cases, petitions, appeals and reviews in matters arising from their own areas, constituencies, directories from the approval panel. Sad officials were empowered to engage in the trial court and district judge courts in accordance with the consultation and fee schedule provided by La Division, Wapda, but no other court had the power of attorney Didn't have to be strict. A compromising lawyer can exercise only the powers that are expressly or implicitly implied in it and the power of attorney's data must be, in the present case, revised by the High Court. Six to appeal and appeal to the Supreme Court
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2014
