14 and 15 In the written petition before the eviction of the land acquired by the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974), the section 44 High Court, the applicants were convinced that they were entitled to take back the land. Is over and the writ petition was rejected by the High Court. The government acquired the property but it was not utilized and the waste was granted because the applicants seized the said land because the non-Moros government had acquired the land. Was free to use which was obtained. For the public purpose and after fulfilling it, the land remained surplus and unused, noting the other public purpose for the approved scheme that the government wanted to use the aforesaid land for any other public purpose, so suitable. Was not in favor of the government and to confirm the occupation of the land was entered as respondents of WAPDA who moved the application to evict the applicants only WAPDA can apply for deportation of applicants. Was. No irrelevant person had the right to expel anyone who had possession of the land. It was correctly observed by the High Court that only Wapda can apply for settlement of underground land. If the search filed by the High Court was not used, he was entitled to remain in his possession that the possession of the applicants was unlawfully required. The written petition was remanded to the High Court for a fresh decision on the merit. It was accepted with the observation that the applicants should not be in possession. High Court writ petition settlement
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2014
