Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARIF versus MUHAMMAD IQBAL

The suit, for the declaration of the vacant property bar in section 41 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), of the jurisdiction of section 42 civil court, was dismissed on the ground that the suit was vacant property and the civil court had legal status. There is no jurisdiction to maintain the jurisdiction of The civil court case was excluded in relation to the matters whether any person or property was vacant property or what right or interest a vacant person may have in the illegal property to determine the status of any person. The property was either a vacant property and was not in the possession of the plaintiffs as a passport or property eviction or non-eviction. Is also not authorized to entertain the matter. The current case was rightly dismissed The appeal was dismissed with costs.

Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2014

• KAMRAN SHEHZAD v. SIKANDER LATIF 2014 YLR 1500
• ZAFFAR MEHMOOD v. MUZAFFAR 2014 PCrLJ 1512
• MUHAMMAD TARIQ v. Syed ALAM SHAH 2014 MLD 1519
• WAPDA through Chief Engineer/Project Director, Mangla Raising Project, Mangla v. Raja MAROOF 2014 CLC 1624
• MUHAMMAD RIAZ v. KALA KHAN 2014 MLD 1759
• AMEER QABAL v. STATE of AJ&K through Advocate General/Additional Advocate General 2014 YLR 1771
• Dr. MUHAMMAD EJAZ KHAN v. Dr. MAQBOOL AHMED 2014 YLR 1809
• ABDUL RAUF KHAN v. MUHAMMAD HANIF 2014 YLR 2258

All Supreme Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2014 →

famous supreme court advocate from Noshki lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes