Section 230 (b), 7 397 and 1212 Act Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 day, the bank robber was praised and the accused was arrested shortly after commission of the crime. Therefore, there is no question of any doubt about it. And the pistol, initially used by the accused, was substantiated by the ocular testimony, obtained by medical evidence in connection with the death of the Guard of Bank injuries. Further confirmation was made and the bullets recovered from his dead body were directly linked to the ocular account.His role was successfully defined without any ambiguity about the identity or involvement of the accused. Despite the evidence, the prosecution's allegations of being a bank employee had a direct impact on the evidence, supporting the accusation of the accused rather than damaging the value of their evidence, Because the incident happened at the bank, employees were attacked and money was robbed in front of their eyes, so they were released Simply because it can harm the contradictions that bank employees had not stirred from the internal evidence of witnesses, the replacement value of the disputed rule was very low. The murder case, especially in the present case, where the witnesses or the parties concerned had no personal interest, hostility or prior acquaintance with the case, as was proved against the accused and the accused was convicted under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
