Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 324/337 F (v) Guarantee, the cancellation of the medical report shows that the injury was attributed to the defendant, Section 337 F (v), The PPC was included in the FIR, though kept in jail for four months, but it was not an unusual time under Section 497, the CCPC's prohibited clause, in these cases the bail was granted. Were not considered for the purpose which were presented under the Prohibition Clause 497. The CCP trial court had largely ignored the fact that the bail phase only considered preliminary doctrine or evidence definition under the law, which contained the discriminatory material on record, including the Medico legal report and others. Expert opinion was also included which showed that the injury was due to injury. The pistol was directly and indirectly injured by the pistol, which was itself a weapon of crime, with enough material from the suspects to carry the Ct suspect into the FIR. It has been alleged that when the bail was approved with the Commission, it could only be canceled on strong and extraordinary grounds, which would have allowed the approved bail, ignoring the principles and principles of law on the subject. Or when the order of bail was wrong and in fact the wrong trial court's observation was not valid that the person injured While the nature of the injury was not known or was not established by the prosecution record, it was clear that the injury was caused by a serious injury. The reason for this was when the latest content was brought in after breaking the record
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
