AXXI, RR 85, 86, 66 and 90 Property Court auction sale, without authorization, against the supply of O XXI, R 85, CPC had set 30 days to pay its balance , Which was otherwise required to be paid within the terms of OXI, R-85, CPC within a period of 15 days, and the court ignored it without any logical reason, which would result in the law being sold at auction. And there was a lot of other stuff in the process that was violated. The property, too, was taken notice by the High Court, and such egregious and gross violations of the law have rendered the sale corrupt, in the circumstances, refusing to reject the preliminary judgment and injunction, however, In accepting, the final judgment and decree and the defamation order, dismissing the objections of the appellants and verifying the sale in favor of the auction buyer, were presented by the High Court and the matter was referred to the trial court while the new Court auctions were appointed to appoint HC. The ust observed that the sale was set aside on the basis of material irregularities and fraud and in this regard highlighted the role of the court auction, which did not go beyond the board. The entire fee was considered to be a refund, under which he was charged. The decision was highlighted by the Presiding Officer of the trial, regarding the error action and the commission's one-month period, wanting the copy of the decision to be presented to the Chief Justice for appropriate decision.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
