Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ALTAF ASHRAF versus STATE


Section 9 (c) Definition of Evidence Section 164, except for the statement of the co-accused under the CCPC, the prosecution did not submit a dough of evidence to establish the accused's involvement in the case, the participant under section 646464 Statement of the accused, CRPC has been recorded. In the absence of the accused, the accused was not provided an opportunity to inspect the co-accused's co-inspection, therefore, could not be used as a particular piece of evidence against the accused, especially when the co-accused was in the case. Confessing his guilt before. The court did not name the accused because the consent of one of his co-accused or his partner's testimony could not be safely relied upon when the accused was acquitted in the absence of a piece of evidence to prove it. ?

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
us immigration advocates from Shamsabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.